Upgrade to Premium! Get full access to the world's best BDSM resource.
Notification Caption x | |
|---|---|
 | Notification box |
Notification Caption x | |
|---|---|
| Notification box |
| ||||
| ||||
 All Forums BDSM Talk and Support BDSM Technique curitive cum |  Login to Reply New Topic |  Printer Friendly |
|
| Author | Topic | |
|---|---|---|
| NRP | Posted: 2005-08-03 19:23 | |
Southernbelle United States 27,586 Posts | Tymbrimi: A_Southernbelle: Tymbrimi: A_Southernbelle: Urea is in several balms for diabetics to use on wounds. My father is a diabetic and he has a great deal of troubles. I was reading his creams and was amazed at discovering it. I asked his dr about it and he said that yes it was chemically synthesized urine. Urea is not a synonym for urine. -- Flame-throwers. Machine-gun fire. Torpedoes. Panic. Don't try to figure us out, we're bipolar. Just hope that we get distracted by a fire truck and don't notice your country. - Livestock, on Something Awful. Where did you see that I said it was a synonym for urine? Perhaps reading the post will help in the future for you to avoid assuming what you want in a sentence. Have a great day. Where did I post that you had said urea was a synonym for urine? Perhaps actually reading the post (you can get someone to help you with the hard words) will help in the future for you to avoid, you know, looking stupid. Eh, I really don't care about your day. Perhaps it will include your remedial reading class. Don't try to figure us out, we're bipolar. Just hope that we get distracted by a fire truck and don't notice your country. - Livestock, on Something Awful. You said after quoting me: Perhaps your reading comprehension skills need sharpening. I am sure you don't care about my day. You come across as someone that doesn't care about anyone or anything. PMS may be the reason for that. The other reason, is very unappealing to think that anyone could act in such a childish manner to needlessly attack others. It tends to make those that act such, to end up lonely bitter old people. I will hold out hope that it is the first reason. Edited by - A_Southernbelle on 2005-08-03 19:25:02 | |
  | ||
| Tymbrimi | Posted: 2005-08-03 20:23 | |
Forum Slut United States 1,496 Posts | A_Southernbelle: Tymbrimi: A_Southernbelle: Tymbrimi: A_Southernbelle: Urea is in several balms for diabetics to use on wounds. My father is a diabetic and he has a great deal of troubles. I was reading his creams and was amazed at discovering it. I asked his dr about it and he said that yes it was chemically synthesized urine. Urea is not a synonym for urine. -- Flame-throwers. Machine-gun fire. Torpedoes. Panic. Don't try to figure us out, we're bipolar. Just hope that we get distracted by a fire truck and don't notice your country. - Livestock, on Something Awful. Where did you see that I said it was a synonym for urine? Perhaps reading the post will help in the future for you to avoid assuming what you want in a sentence. Have a great day. Where did I post that you had said urea was a synonym for urine? Perhaps actually reading the post (you can get someone to help you with the hard words) will help in the future for you to avoid, you know, looking stupid. Eh, I really don't care about your day. Perhaps it will include your remedial reading class. Don't try to figure us out, we're bipolar. Just hope that we get distracted by a fire truck and don't notice your country. - Livestock, on Something Awful. You said after quoting me: Actually, it's known as "a statement of fact"; a neutral sentence. You bunched your unwashed undies around your ears over it, though, and now you're whining about being corrected. Think of it as a lesson in not being so self-centered as to think everything pertains to you on a personal level. A_Southernbelle: I see you are rather new here. I wish you all the luck in gaining friendships. Unlike you, I didn't have to go on-line to find friends. I already have them; they are fine, intelligent people with true value to society. A_Southernbelle:I am sure by the many emails, that it is NOT I that is looking stupid. Translation: "Me and my invisible friends are all upset and stuff. Yeah! And things." A_Southernbelle: Perhaps your reading comprehension skills need sharpening. Doing better than yours. I'm not saying that took a lot of effort, mind you. A_Southernbelle: I am sure you don't care about my day. You come across as someone that doesn't care about anyone or anything. PMS may be the reason for that. Do try not to project your personal physical disabilites onto others. It is most unattractive. A_Southernbelle: The other reason, is very unappealing to think that anyone could act in such a childish manner to needlessly attack others. I agree that you behaved in a most childish manner by attacking (and continuing to attack) me but why not move on from that and learn to be less self-involved? A_Southernbelle: It tends to make those that act such, to end up lonely bitter old people. Oh, no! A life spent unsurrounded by pretentious imbeciles who have delusions of redeeming value! A_Southernbelle: I will hold out hope that it is the first reason. Have a great evening. But either way, I will still hope the best for you in your days. Edited by - A_Southernbelle on 2005-08-03 19:25:02 The only one for whom you should hope is yourself. The rest of the universe will do quite nicely without you. -- Flame-throwers. Machine-gun fire. Torpedoes. Panic. Don't try to figure us out, we're bipolar. Just hope that we get distracted by a fire truck and don't notice your country. - Livestock, on Something Awful. | |
| ||
| NRP | Posted: 2005-08-03 20:43 | |
| Southernbelle United States 27,586 Posts | Tymbrimi: A_Southernbelle: Tymbrimi: A_Southernbelle: Tymbrimi: A_Southernbelle: Urea is in several balms for diabetics to use on wounds. My father is a diabetic and he has a great deal of troubles. I was reading his creams and was amazed at discovering it. I asked his dr about it and he said that yes it was chemically synthesized urine. LOL. I Don't try to figure us out, we're bipolar. Just hope that we get distracted by a fire truck and don't notice your country. - Livestock, on Something Awful. Where did you see that I said it was a synonym for urine? Perhaps reading the post will help in the future for you to avoid assuming what you want in a sentence. Have a great day. Where did I post that you had said urea was a synonym for urine? Perhaps actually reading the post (you can get someone to help you with the hard words) will help in the future for you to avoid, you know, looking stupid. Eh, I really don't care about your day. Perhaps it will include your remedial reading class. Don't try to figure us out, we're bipolar. Just hope that we get distracted by a fire truck and don't notice your country. - Livestock, on Something Awful. You said after quoting me: Actually, it's known as "a statement of fact"; a neutral sentence. You bunched your unwashed undies around your ears over it, though, and now you're whining about being corrected. Think of it as a lesson in not being so self-centered as to think everything pertains to you on a personal level. A_Southernbelle: I see you are rather new here. I wish you all the luck in gaining friendships. Unlike you, I didn't have to go on-line to find friends. I already have them; they are fine, intelligent people with true value to society. A_Southernbelle:I am sure by the many emails, that it is NOT I that is looking stupid. Translation: "Me and my invisible friends are all upset and stuff. Yeah! And things." A_Southernbelle: Perhaps your reading comprehension skills need sharpening. Doing better than yours. I'm not saying that took a lot of effort, mind you. A_Southernbelle: I am sure you don't care about my day. You come across as someone that doesn't care about anyone or anything. PMS may be the reason for that. Do try not to project your personal physical disabilites onto others. It is most unattractive. A_Southernbelle: The other reason, is very unappealing to think that anyone could act in such a childish manner to needlessly attack others. I agree that you behaved in a most childish manner by attacking (and continuing to attack) me but why not move on from that and learn to be less self-involved? A_Southernbelle: It tends to make those that act such, to end up lonely bitter old people. Oh, no! A life spent unsurrounded by pretentious imbeciles who have delusions of redeeming value! A_Southernbelle: I will hold out hope that it is the first reason. Have a great evening. But either way, I will still hope the best for you in your days. Edited by - A_Southernbelle on 2005-08-03 19:25:02 The only one for whom you should hope is yourself. The rest of the universe will do quite nicely without you. -- Flame-throwers. Machine-gun fire. Torpedoes. Panic. Don't try to figure us out, we're bipolar. Just hope that we get distracted by a fire truck and don't notice your country. - Livestock, on Something Awful. Had your information corrected my statement then that might have been true. However, since you did NOT correct me, then that is a moot point. You have to provide correct information against incorrect information, before you can correct someone else. You failed in this area. | |
| ||
| sksadvntr | Posted: 2005-08-03 21:27 | |
Forum Maniac United States 13,109 Posts | Tymbrimi: A_Southernbelle: Urea is in several balms for diabetics to use on wounds. My father is a diabetic and he has a great deal of troubles. I was reading his creams and was amazed at discovering it. I asked his dr about it and he said that yes it was chemically synthesized urine. Urea is not a synonym for urine. You know. She never said it was a synonym for urea. She only quoted the doctor. If there is a mistake, it is in the doctor's use of the word urine. However, I am willing to bet that he used that term in an effort (mistaken or not) to make the concept a bit more understandable for a lay person. So, that said, why are you having so much trouble with this that you find it necessary to rudely correct someone and then to pursue the point when others readily agree that they are not the same yet take exception to your general tone? Your attacks back at those who find exception to your method of delivery have taken on a very personal tone. It is no wonder that the responses you are now receiving have also become personal. I know you ae probably superior to the rest of us, but can't you have pity and play nice too! [/sarcasm] Life is funny how it balances its cruelties; giving with one hand, taking with the other. | |
| ||
| Tymbrimi | Posted: 2005-08-03 21:45 | |
Forum Slut United States 1,496 Posts | sksadvntr: Tymbrimi: A_Southernbelle: Urea is in several balms for diabetics to use on wounds. My father is a diabetic and he has a great deal of troubles. I was reading his creams and was amazed at discovering it. I asked his dr about it and he said that yes it was chemically synthesized urine. Urea is not a synonym for urine. You know. She never said it was a synonym for urea. She only quoted the doctor. If there is a mistake, it is in the doctor's use of the word urine. However, I am willing to bet that he used that term in an effort (mistaken or not) to make the concept a bit more understandable for a lay person. If you read my entire post (all seven words of it), then you'd have noticed that the correction was not directed at any one person. sksadvntr: So, that said, why are you having so much trouble with this that you find it necessary to rudely correct someone and then to pursue the point when others readily agree that they are not the same yet take exception to your general tone? The only rudeness in my post is the reader's fragile ego at play. Nor did anyone else "readily agree that they are not the same." Try reading the actual words posted instead of listening to the voices in your head. sksadvntr: Your attacks back at those who find exception to your method of delivery have taken on a very personal tone. It is no wonder that the responses you are now receiving have also become personal. You'd think by now I'd cease to be surprised at the number of people who feel that someone attacking them back is such a horrible crime. Don't want to be attacked by me? Don't start with me. sksadvntr: I know you ae probably superior to the rest of us, but can't you have pity and play nice too! I'll try be nicer if you'll try be smarter. -- Don't try to figure us out, we're bipolar. Just hope that we get distracted by a fire truck and don't notice your country. - Livestock, on Something Awful. | |
| ||
| Tymbrimi | Posted: 2005-08-03 21:56 | |
Forum Slut United States 1,496 Posts | A_Southernbelle: Tymbrimi: A_Southernbelle: Tymbrimi: A_Southernbelle: Tymbrimi: A_Southernbelle: Urea is in several balms for diabetics to use on wounds. My father is a diabetic and he has a great deal of troubles. I was reading his creams and was amazed at discovering it. I asked his dr about it and he said that yes it was chemically synthesized urine. Urea is not a synonym for urine. Where did you see that I said it was a synonym for urine? Perhaps reading the post will help in the future for you to avoid assuming what you want in a sentence. Have a great day. Where did I post that you had said urea was a synonym for urine? Perhaps actually reading the post (you can get someone to help you with the hard words) will help in the future for you to avoid, you know, looking stupid. Eh, I really don't care about your day. Perhaps it will include your remedial reading class. You said after quoting me: Actually, it's known as "a statement of fact"; a neutral sentence. You bunched your unwashed undies around your ears over it, though, and now you're whining about being corrected. Think of it as a lesson in not being so self-centered as to think everything pertains to you on a personal level. A_Southernbelle: I see you are rather new here. I wish you all the luck in gaining friendships. Unlike you, I didn't have to go on-line to find friends. I already have them; they are fine, intelligent people with true value to society. A_Southernbelle:I am sure by the many emails, that it is NOT I that is looking stupid. Translation: "Me and my invisible friends are all upset and stuff. Yeah! And things." A_Southernbelle: Perhaps your reading comprehension skills need sharpening. Doing better than yours. I'm not saying that took a lot of effort, mind you. A_Southernbelle: I am sure you don't care about my day. You come across as someone that doesn't care about anyone or anything. PMS may be the reason for that. Do try not to project your personal physical disabilites onto others. It is most unattractive. A_Southernbelle: The other reason, is very unappealing to think that anyone could act in such a childish manner to needlessly attack others. I agree that you behaved in a most childish manner by attacking (and continuing to attack) me but why not move on from that and learn to be less self-involved? A_Southernbelle: It tends to make those that act such, to end up lonely bitter old people. Oh, no! A life spent unsurrounded by pretentious imbeciles who have delusions of redeeming value! A_Southernbelle: I will hold out hope that it is the first reason. Have a great evening. But either way, I will still hope the best for you in your days. Edited by - A_Southernbelle on 2005-08-03 19:25:02 The only one for whom you should hope is yourself. The rest of the universe will do quite nicely without you. Had your information corrected my statement then that might have been true. However, since you did NOT correct me, then that is a moot point. "Urea is not a synonym for urine" is a correct statement. If you believe it isn't, then provide proof to the contrary. A_Southernbelle: You have to provide correct information against incorrect information, before you can correct someone else. You failed in this area. Balderdash. Had you asked for information about the amino acid and its role in metabolism, then I would feel obliged to provide it for you. However, making the statement that one specific noun does not substitute for another is not an instance of "having to provide correct information against incorrect information." A_Southernbelle: But I will not waste my time on the rest of the childish remarks. What, did your invisible friends all leave you? A_Southernbelle: I think your post will show all your true characteristics. You have represented yourself the way you wanted others to see you. That is enough said. What a stupid thing to say. I've never pretended to be anyone or anything other than myself. Seriously, stop projecting your character defects onto others. -- Don't try to figure us out, we're bipolar. Just hope that we get distracted by a fire truck and don't notice your country. - Livestock, on Something Awful. | |
| ||
| sksadvntr | Posted: 2005-08-03 22:26 | |
Forum Maniac United States 13,109 Posts | Tymbrimi: When you quote someone, that is a response to them. Your original comment was brusque...hence rude. There are nicer ways to disagree. IF you had wanted to make it a general comment, you could have quoted what was said, without referring to her, corrected the statement, and amplified it just enough to make it clear that you also knew that urea is a significant component of urine. That would have made the point clear to everyone. And, in doing it in a nice manner you would also have headed off any possiblity that it would be construed as an attack on an individual as well. Instead, you were short in your response...making it appear that you were attacking the person's statement as being incorrect, and opening yourself up to a misinterpretation of your intent in as much as someone offered to clarify your statement. You attacked them as well. You were rude. Subsequent commentary by you became personal in nature and rude by most any other measure. My opinion. So, you can disagree if you want...it won't change my opinion. I still say that there are nicer ways to disagree than presenting yourself as better than another...as you did in your comment to me. The only thing I said to you, that can be construed as rude, is what I think of your apparent (at least to me) exalted opinion of yourself. You have more than amply proved that point in your reply to me. I would suggest you get over it. Oh, and if you want to insult me...go ahead...others have tried. I ignore the insults. They speak volumes about the person hurling them. Life is funny how it balances its cruelties; giving with one hand, taking with the other. | |
| ||
| Tymbrimi | Posted: 2005-08-03 22:40 | |
Forum Slut United States 1,496 Posts | sksadvntr: Tymbrimi: When you quote someone, that is a response to them. Your original comment was brusque...hence rude. Brusque is not a synonym for rude. Correction: A friend has pointed out that the newer version of Roget's Thesaurus now includes brusque as a synonym for discourteous and rude. I apologise for the error. sksadvntr: There are nicer ways to disagree. IF you had wanted to make it a general comment, you could have quoted what was said, without referring to her, corrected the statement, and amplified it just enough to make it clear that you also knew that urea is a significant component of urine. That would have made the point clear to everyone. And, in doing it in a nice manner you would also have headed off any possiblity that it would be construed as an attack on an individual as well. Instead, you were short in your response...making it appear that you were attacking the person's statement as being incorrect, and opening yourself up to a misinterpretation of your intent in as much as someone offered to clarify your statement. Had anyone wished for clarification, they would have asked. Of course, anyone who wasn't smart enough to avoid being insulted by a general statement that didn't attack anyone isn't clearly not intelligent enough to understand any further clarification. sksadvntr: You attacked them as well. You were rude. Being polite to stupid people only encourages them to think they have worth. sksadvntr: Subsequent commentary by you became personal in nature and rude by most any other measure. How terribly unfair of people to fight back against those who attack them. Next you'll be complaining because some kids fight back against schoolyard bullies. sksadvntr: My opinion. So, you can disagree if you want...it won't change my opinion. I'll try to remember to make a note to remind myself to give a damn about your opinion one of these days. sksadvntr: I would suggest you get over it. You go first. sksadvntr: Oh, and if you want to insult me...go ahead...others have tried. I ignore the insults. They speak volumes about the person hurling them. I hardly need your permission to insult you; you aren't that special. edited for correction. Don't try to figure us out, we're bipolar. Just hope that we get distracted by a fire truck and don't notice your country. - Livestock, on Something Awful. Edited by - Tymbrimi on 2005-08-03 22:46:43 | |
| ||
| sksadvntr | Posted: 2005-08-03 22:41 | |
Forum Maniac United States 13,109 Posts | Yawn! I suggest you improve your vocabulary...from Dictionary.com: brusque adj : marked by rude or peremptory shortness; It is also listed as a synonym for rude. Sorry, but since you are passing out false information, it was necessary to correct this first instance. The rest, you can correct for your own self. Oh, let me ask you a question...would you call yourself 'stupid' for screwing up the definition of brusque? Tymbrimi: sksadvntr: Tymbrimi: When you quote someone, that is a response to them. Your original comment was brusque...hence rude. Brusque is not a synonym for rude. sksadvntr: There are nicer ways to disagree. IF you had wanted to make it a general comment, you could have quoted what was said, without referring to her, corrected the statement, and amplified it just enough to make it clear that you also knew that urea is a significant component of urine. That would have made the point clear to everyone. And, in doing it in a nice manner you would also have headed off any possiblity that it would be construed as an attack on an individual as well. Instead, you were short in your response...making it appear that you were attacking the person's statement as being incorrect, and opening yourself up to a misinterpretation of your intent in as much as someone offered to clarify your statement. Had anyone wished for clarification, they would have asked. Of course, anyone who wasn't smart enough to avoid being insulted by a general statement that didn't attack anyone isn't clearly not intelligent enough to understand any further clarification. sksadvntr: You attacked them as well. You were rude. Being polite to stupid people only encourages them to think they have worth. sksadvntr: Subsequent commentary by you became personal in nature and rude by most any other measure. How terribly unfair of people to fight back against those who attack them. Next you'll be complaining because some kids fight back against schoolyard bullies. sksadvntr: My opinion. So, you can disagree if you want...it won't change my opinion. I'll try to remember to make a note to remind myself to give a damn about your opinion one of these days. sksadvntr: I would suggest you get over it. You go first. sksadvntr: Oh, and if you want to insult me...go ahead...others have tried. I ignore the insults. They speak volumes about the person hurling them. I hardly need your permission to insult you; you aren't that special. -- Flame-throwers. Machine-gun fire. Torpedoes. Panic. Don't try to figure us out, we're bipolar. Just hope that we get distracted by a fire truck and don't notice your country. - Livestock, on Something Awful.
Life is funny how it balances its cruelties; giving with one hand, taking with the other. Edited by - sksadvntr on 2005-08-03 22:45:45 Edited by - sksadvntr on 2005-08-03 22:47:58 | |
| ||
| Tymbrimi | Posted: 2005-08-03 22:48 | |
Forum Slut United States 1,496 Posts | sksadvntr: Yawn! I suggest you improve your vocabulary...from Dictionary.com: brusque adj : marked by rude or peremptory shortness; It is also listed as a synonym for rude. Sorry, but since you are passing out false information, it was necessary to correct this first instance. The rest, you can correct for your own self. I'd already been making the correction, dolt. If you think anything else in my post is incorrect, then post the corrections. Otherwise, I'll just go on assuming you've no idea what you're talking about.
Don't try to figure us out, we're bipolar. Just hope that we get distracted by a fire truck and don't notice your country. - Livestock, on Something Awful. | |
| ||
| sksadvntr | Posted: 2005-08-03 22:54 | |
Forum Maniac United States 13,109 Posts | Tymbrimi: sksadvntr: Yawn! I suggest you improve your vocabulary...from Dictionary.com: brusque adj : marked by rude or peremptory shortness; It is also listed as a synonym for rude. Sorry, but since you are passing out false information, it was necessary to correct this first instance. The rest, you can correct for your own self. I'd already been making the correction, dolt. If you think anything else in my post is incorrect, then post the corrections. Otherwise, I'll just go on assuming you've no idea what you're talking about.
Don't try to figure us out, we're bipolar. Just hope that we get distracted by a fire truck and don't notice your country. - Livestock, on Something Awful. Why? ...taking corrections from stupid people and dolts? I would think that would be beneath your highness's level. Life is funny how it balances its cruelties; giving with one hand, taking with the other. | |
| ||
| Tymbrimi | Posted: 2005-08-03 22:55 | |
Forum Slut United States 1,496 Posts | sksadvntr: Oh, let me ask you a question...would you call yourself 'stupid' for screwing up the definition of brusque? Do try not to be more of ass than normal, 'k? Oh, sorry. I forgot you aren't capable of change. Oxford Dictionary of Current English: Brusque; adj. abrupt or offhand Webster's New Twentieth Century Unabridged Dictionary -- Don't try to figure us out, we're bipolar. Just hope that we get distracted by a fire truck and don't notice your country. - Livestock, on Something Awful. | |
| ||
| Tymbrimi | Posted: 2005-08-03 22:57 | |
Forum Slut United States 1,496 Posts | sksadvntr: Why? ...taking corrections from stupid people and dolts? I would think that would be beneath your highness's level. I didn't say I'd be "taking corrections from stupid people and dolts"; you should probably not drink and post if you're so incapable of following the conversaiton. If you think I'm of royalty, then you're on some serious hard drugs. Or just generally dumb. Don't try to figure us out, we're bipolar. Just hope that we get distracted by a fire truck and don't notice your country. - Livestock, on Something Awful. | |
| ||
| sksadvntr | Posted: 2005-08-03 23:02 | |
Forum Maniac United States 13,109 Posts | Tymbrimi: sksadvntr: Oh, let me ask you a question...would you call yourself 'stupid' for screwing up the definition of brusque? Do try not to be more of ass than normal, 'k? Oh, sorry. I forgot you aren't capable of change. Oxford Dictionary of Current English: Brusque; adj. abrupt or offhand Webster's New Twentieth Century Unabridged Dictionary -- Don't try to figure us out, we're bipolar. Just hope that we get distracted by a fire truck and don't notice your country. - Livestock, on Something Awful. The definition you used from the Oxford dictionary is the compact edition, not the complete edition. As for Webster's, try their thesaurus and, by the way, look up the definition of blunt. You might actually learn something if you use complete dictionaries instead of the redacted versions. As for the insults....tsk tsk you keep sinking lower. Life is funny how it balances its cruelties; giving with one hand, taking with the other. | |
| ||
| Tymbrimi | Posted: 2005-08-03 23:11 | |
Forum Slut United States 1,496 Posts | sksadvntr: Tymbrimi: sksadvntr: Oh, let me ask you a question...would you call yourself 'stupid' for screwing up the definition of brusque? Do try not to be more of ass than normal, 'k? Oh, sorry. I forgot you aren't capable of change. Oxford Dictionary of Current English: Brusque; adj. abrupt or offhand Webster's New Twentieth Century Unabridged Dictionary -- Don't try to figure us out, we're bipolar. Just hope that we get distracted by a fire truck and don't notice your country. - Livestock, on Something Awful. The definition you used from the Oxford dictionary is the compact edition, not the complete edition. I didn't say it was the complete edition. Since you apparently have one, how about posting its definition for 'brusque' for all to see. sksadvntr: As for Webster's, try their thesaurus and, by the way, look up the definition of blunt. The word in question was 'brusque', not 'blunt'. Try to keep up here. sksadvntr: You might actually learn something if you use complete dictionaries instead of the redacted versions. Wow, I've been eyeing that complete Oxford for some time. It's so kind of you to offer to buy it for me. sksadvntr: As for the insults....tsk tsk you keep sinking lower. And yet, I'm still above you. Funny ol' thing, life. How ya doin' on those other corrections to my purportedly-incorrect post? Don't try to figure us out, we're bipolar. Just hope that we get distracted by a fire truck and don't notice your country. - Livestock, on Something Awful. | |
| ||
|
| Login to Reply New Topic Printer Friendly | Snitz Forums 2000 |
Bondage Forums
