Notification Caption x | |
|---|---|
Notification box | |
| ||||
| ||||
|
| Author | Topic | |
|---|---|---|
| Ellison | Posted: 2004-08-29 05:47 | |
Forum Maniac United States 29,281 Posts | ceanthia: Sorry, but I AM A VET. So you are totally off base with you vet bashing line. Questioning someones service record is acceptable when they make it the forefront of their campaign. It is not my fault Kerry lied about Cambodia and then claimed a purple heart he did not deserve. KERRY is the one that came back and accused the Vet of committing crimes. It IS my right to question it. So, that means you stand behind me 110% when I question Bush's record in the Air National Guard, right? One veteran to another? -- You're not your job. You're not how much money you have in the bank. You're not the car you drive. You're not the contents of your wallet. You're not your fucking khakis. You're the all-singing, all-dancing crap of the world. -Fight Club | |
| mister_mo_jo | Posted: 2004-08-29 11:29 | |
| Forum Initiate United States 11 Posts | Amadeus: DominantnLA: He wants to hand over the U.S. to the U.N,. and subjecate military personnel to the I.C.C. That alone should alarm any U.S. American. You know, the US mission to the UN fought hard to ensure that U.S. Peacekeepers were exempt from the ICC's jurisdiction... ...and it was successful up until the Abu Gharib scandal and the questionable tactics of housing enemy combatants at guantanamo without due process in violation of the geneva conventions. Now we have no chance at winning any exemption, so don't tell me that Kerry would subject military personnel to the ICC when Bush pissed away any goodwill that would have exempted our soldiers.
Interesting how Amadeus implies that Bush is responsible for Abu Gharib. Just another of the inumerable lies coming from the left. The US is not a signatory to the ICC, so it is not bound by it. If I were President, and the ICC took custody of US soldiers, I'd give them one and only one chance to release them. If they refused, I send the Marines into Holland to free them. And, no, I am not kidding. | |
| Dominkilt | Posted: 2004-08-29 11:34 | |
Forum Slut United States 1,786 Posts | Oh please... you question one veteran and suddenly you're a veteran-basher? Bullshit! So if there is a bad cop and you point it out, you are a cop-basher? Typical disingenuous liberal argument. Take a single instance, paint with broad strokes and condemn it as if it were systimatic rather than a narrowly focused criticism. Puh-fucking-lease! -- Regrets, I've had a few... but then again too few to mention... | |
| mister_mo_jo | Posted: 2004-08-29 11:46 | |
| Forum Initiate United States 11 Posts | selkie_woman: And don't forget to point out that Bush, who has single-handedly plunged Iraq into what amounts to civil war, is brilliant and remarkably fit to command. -- Give me life strong and full as the brimming ocean; give me thoughts as wide as its plain; give me a soul beyond these. Richard Jeffries "Single-handedly"? According to the US Constitition, congress (not the president) authorizes war, which they did in Iraq by approx. 75%. Kerry and Edwards were among those who voted IN FAVOR of authorizing military intervention in Iraq. And don't forget that the UK, Australia, and Poland also sent troops. "Civil war"? Perhaps "low-level insurgency" I what you meant. In a civil war, large numbers of people are enagaged on both sides. How many insurgents are there? 5,000? 10,000? Even if there are 25,000, that's 0.1% of Iraq's population. Get a clue!! | |
| mister_mo_jo | Posted: 2004-08-29 12:03 | |
| Forum Initiate United States 11 Posts | Futbol: Kerry enlisted in the naval RESERVES in 1966, not the navy. Isn't this a lot like enlisting in the National Guard? Futbol's post is an extremely important point that bears repeating. Kerry volunteered for the Naval Reserve, not the active Navy. Ironic, isn't it, that the Kerry camp criticizes Bush for volunteering for a reserve component (i.e., Air Nationl Guard) when Kerry himself also volunteered for a reserve component? This is hypocrisy, pure and simple. Speaking of hypocrisy, here's Kerry's ultimate hypocrisy. Kerry and his camp complain that the Swiftboat Veterans for Truth ( http://www.swiftvets.com/ ) are smearing his service. But Kerry, when he gave sworn congressional testimony in 1971, and in other statements, smeared the service of EVERY soldier who fought in Vietnam. Moreover, he claimed that attrocities committed by US soldiers "were not isolated incidents but crimes committed on a day-to-day basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command" (Kerry's own words in sworn congressional testimony). Kerry built his early political career by walking all over Vietnam vets. Please remember that when you go to the polls. | |
| ahto44 | Posted: 2004-08-29 13:08 | |
| Forum Apprentice United States 281 Posts | Amadeus: Wow! That's some deductive reasoning! You know, I recall Kerry has flown back to D.C. to vote on important veterans legislation about this time and I found it amazing that after Kerry showed up to vote, you know, getting off the campaign trail to do so, the republicans by all accounts intentionally delayed the vote to show Kerry up and take him off the campaign trail FOR A FEW DAYS. Kerry went back on the campaign trail. So, because ALL republicans voted AGAINST the amendment and all democrats voted for the amendment and Kerry simply did not vote (which if he did wouldn't have made a bit of difference in the vote..) he is a failure as a leader somehow? I've never said I approved of the Rep's votes. I don't. Perhaps there was some sort of "Vast Republican Conspiracy" as you allude to (shades of Madam Hilary).... The question remains: what was his excuse for the previous 18+ years BEFORE he was running for President? Play Safe (and do your homework) Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power. | |
| YankBottom | Posted: 2004-08-29 18:58 | |
Forum Initiate United States 26 Posts | the atrocities in viet nam WERE NOT isolated incidents. they were policies. what part of 'free fire zone' do you not understand? that means kill every man woman and child which certainly qualifies as 'atrocity' and that order was given to american severicemen in viet nam often. the crime was the orders! the soldiers were mostly doing the best they could in that horror show though some went war mad. i have read first person accounts from vets who targeted mortar fire to a baby crying. and they find it fucking hard to live with. it was the only sound to locate the living in the zone everyone was supposedly warned to leave. so any living were assumed to be enemies. that is a 'free fire zone'. the only problem is that peasants who get shot up by both sides still need to plant their rice and try to stay alive and they probably can't read the leaflet that might have been dropped near their village telling them to go away or get killed anyway. so they hide when each side comes, and each side murders some of them. that is worthy of coming home and saying, 'HEY! we need to stop this!' to come home and say that giving such orders is wrong is a GREAT thing to do. and no, of course, i do not blame the soldiers. i do blame the ones who gave such orders. to come home and say no one wants to be the last man who died for a mistake is also great. 'land war in asia' is a military aphorism for 'unwinnable'. but lots of people on all 4 sides, usa, north viet nam, south viet nam, and peasants who just belonged to their villages and truly no nation at all, died and were tortured and crippled and crazed. that war was an ugly loser and saying so was brave and right. ben barnes, then the lt gov of texas is on videotape viewable at buzzflash apologizing for getting bush and a lot of other kids of the rich and powerful into the safe harbor of the texas national guard while the powerless got drafted and sent over to manage as best they could with sometimes unbearably cruel orders and a very very ugly loser of an ill conceived and poorly strategized war. barnes said when he visits the war memorial he is ashamed of himself. why is all of this germane? bush did not go and hasn't got a clue. he is sending young men and women into situations almost as hopeless and horrible. kerry did go and has a clue. things are not very rosy in iraq or afghanistan. the 'easy' delusional wars of these men now in power who did not go are killing, torturing crippling and crazing a lot of people without achieving the avowed, and worthy, aim of making america safer from terrorism. if we are going to send our sons and daughters to kill and die it needs to be for a very good reason and to achieve its aims. those who have served in combat are much more likely to be careful with the lives of those they command. the bush team talks about war like some video game! 'shock and awe'. if the big lie had been true, if saddam was near to having nuclear weapons, that was enough reason. but it was a lie. not a mistake. a lie. and now we are stuck there. getting back out is not going to be easy, whoever is elected. | |
| ceanthia | Posted: 2004-08-29 21:12 | |
Forum Maniac United States 7,892 Posts | You mean your delusion that he was AWOL even when it is proven he put in the days required? No, I don't share you delusions. Ellison: ceanthia: Sorry, but I AM A VET. So you are totally off base with you vet bashing line. Questioning someones service record is acceptable when they make it the forefront of their campaign. It is not my fault Kerry lied about Cambodia and then claimed a purple heart he did not deserve. KERRY is the one that came back and accused the Vet of committing crimes. It IS my right to question it. So, that means you stand behind me 110% when I question Bush's record in the Air National Guard, right? One veteran to another? -- You're not your job. You're not how much money you have in the bank. You're not the car you drive. You're not the contents of your wallet. You're not your fucking khakis. You're the all-singing, all-dancing crap of the world. -Fight Club -- Ceanthia Edited by - ceanthia on 2004-08-29 21:14:55 | |
| TypeA_Sub | Posted: 2004-08-29 21:16 | |
Face Fiend Canada 17,586 Posts | He's not expecting you to share his opinion but to BACK his right to question Bush - just as you assert your RIGHT to question kerry. ceanthia: You mean your delusion that he was AWOL even when it is proven he put in the days required? No, I don't share you delusions. Ellison: ceanthia: Sorry, but I AM A VET. So you are totally off base with you vet bashing line. Questioning someones service record is acceptable when they make it the forefront of their campaign. It is not my fault Kerry lied about Cambodia and then claimed a purple heart he did not deserve. KERRY is the one that came back and accused the Vet of committing crimes. It IS my right to question it. So, that means you stand behind me 110% when I question Bush's record in the Air National Guard, right? One veteran to another? -- You're not your job. You're not how much money you have in the bank. You're not the car you drive. You're not the contents of your wallet. You're not your fucking khakis. You're the all-singing, all-dancing crap of the world. -Fight Club -- Ceanthia Edited by - ceanthia on 2004-08-29 21:14:55 -- ============================= Joe Canadian Legion The Group of Fun Shite, Underling,Ministry of Nekkid News & Cultural Perversion I hate to be the one to break this you, but you are human - Hells Bel http://www.culturesclash.com | |
| mellowsub | Posted: 2004-08-29 21:33 | |
Forum Maniac United States 14,701 Posts | You mean your delusion that he was AWOL even when it is proven he put in the days required? No, I don't share you delusions. Go look up hypocrite in the dictionary and then look in the mirror. | |
| FlyingProf | Posted: 2004-08-29 22:21 | |
| Forum Regular United States 648 Posts | Futbol's post is an extremely important point that bears repeating. Kerry volunteered for the Naval Reserve, not the active Navy. Ironic, isn't it, that the Kerry camp criticizes Bush for volunteering for a reserve component (i.e., Air Nationl Guard) when Kerry himself also volunteered for a reserve component? This is hypocrisy, pure and simple. I am no Kerry fan, but a point that bears noting is in order. When someone receives a commission, it is rarely a "regular" commission (academy grads being the most notable exception.) The commission is as a "reserve" officer. Most officers can only become a "regular" after several years of satisfactory service as a "reserve" officer. FP Edited by - FlyingProf on 2004-08-29 22:23:19 | |
| Suguy | Posted: 2007-08-22 00:50 | |
Forum Maniac United States 2,991 Posts | All I have to say to all this is that at least Senator Kerry showed up for the War. Bush on the other hand hid in a plane hanger in Texas with the Air National Guard. Nuff Said | |
| SeriousMaster3times22 | Posted: 2007-08-22 01:07 | |
dirty hippie Iraq 5,576 Posts | This thread is even more crucial today then it was three years ago! I'm sure it is. By the way Nixon sucked. | |
| Crouching_tiger77 | Posted: 2007-08-22 01:28 | |
Forum Maniac United States 11,288 Posts | Suguy: All I have to say to all this is that at least Senator Kerry showed up for the War. Bush on the other hand hid in a plane hanger in Texas with the Air National Guard. Nuff Said sixtysix This thread is even more crucial today then it was three years ago! I'm sure it is. By the way Nixon sucked. Is this what is called "Going back into the Archives" or is it something else altogether to go back this far into the 'Post-o-shere'? Now, Back to our scheduled program already in progress. "Now Rochester, Cut that out." Jack Benny Ouch! I feel the breath of enemy aliens from a distant galaxy sucking the two of you up and away, Please resist them, resistance is not futile, resistance is not futile, resistance is not futile, resistance is not futile, resistance is not................. | |
| Sableagle | Posted: 2007-08-22 05:24 | |
Forum Maniac United Kingdom 7,202 Posts | FirePrincess: From the article: "I stand by my story," he told The Telegraph. "It was a long time ago, and I was 19 at the time, so it is hard to remember every detail. But I do know this: at no point did Kerry contact either me or the Crimson to dispute anything I had written." So, for example, if he never read it - or just didn't care what they'd written... Hardly a rousing endorsement for the validity of the claim that he didn't volunteer. It isn't? Damn. I was hoping I could use that as proof that I've been right about Tony the Bliar all this time. | |
|
| Snitz Forums 2000 |