Bondage Forums

Users in AV Chat  Forum users in AV chat:

All Forums All Forums
Other forums in the "Support, Etc." category Support, Etc.
Feedback, bug reports, suggestions Feedback, bug reports, suggestions
Possibly even tighter speech restrictions Possibly even tighter speech restrictions
Login To Reply Login to Reply
New Topic New Topic
Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

 122 Posts on 9 pagesSpacer1Spacer2Spacer3Spacer4Spacer5Spacer6Spacer7Spacer8Spacer9Spacer
AuthorTopicNew Topic Login To Reply 
NaiaPosted: 2004-10-29 18:39
Picture of
Help! I'm being cooerced!
Senior Moderator

Forum Moderator

United States
2,587 Posts
Not surprised, nor involved in a lawsuit. Just disappointed.

Hope you feel better getting a dig in at the mods though. That's classic.
--
NO SMOKING. NO SPITTING.
THE MGT.

Link to this postBack to top of page
NextGuardPosted: 2004-10-30 04:31
Forum Maniac

United States
4,896 Posts

I bet your jackboot...yada yada yada

The irony is that if there were any truth to that - then you wouldn't be able to say that stuff here...

I wish there were something useful the members could do to help with the situation besides just being careful about the language we use right now.
--
NextGuard = Paul from Atlanta
-----------------------------

"You think you lost your horse? Who knows, he may bring a whole herd back to you someday."

Edited by - NextGuard on 2004-10-30 05:10:17

Link to this postBack to top of page
White_HatPosted: 2004-10-30 15:53
Picture of
Forum Maniac

United States
2,283 Posts
I guess this whole thing with the credit card companies baffles me a bit.

IF they are the ones prompting censorship, how in the world do the THOUSANDS of adult sites (all of which, so far as I know, are funded by credit card payments) operate unimpeded?
--
While we can't change the direction of the wind, we can adjust our sails.

Support Our Troops - Vote Bush Out

Link to this postBack to top of page
LakritsPosted: 2004-10-30 17:37
Picture of
USS Intercourse

Sweden
5,388 Posts
Well, since ny visa is due to be renewed in november I'm going to my bank and say exactly what I think.

Edited because I was pissed and pissed when I first wrote it.
--
----
Ya know, I'm a fruitcake. Really!
Min bil e inte lik din bil de e en likbil.
Bugger of! I'm masturbating for peace! http://www.masturbateforpeace.com/
Lattjobolaget Pling och Plong

Edited by - Lakrits on 2004-10-31 18:02:22

Link to this postBack to top of page
subsidencePosted: 2004-10-31 21:29
Forum Initiate

United States
15 Posts
Saw this on another site, might be part of this thread. Maybe someone smarter than me can make something of it.

Sid

For Immediate Release - Please Repost
National Coalition for Sexual Freedom

Contact: Susan Wright, Spokesperson
917.848.6544
_susanw@n..._ (mailto:susanw@n...)
_www.ncsfreedom.org_ (http://www.ncsfreedom.org/)

October 29, 2004, New York City - Testimony concluded on October
28, 2004,
in
Barbara Nitke and National Coalition for Sexual Freedom v John
Ashcroft, in
the
Federal District Court for the Southern District of NY, case # 01
CIV 11476
(RMB).
This lawsuit is challenging an unconstitutional law called the
Communications
Decency Act (CDA) which criminalizes free speech on the Internet.
Plaintiffs
are
represented by noted First Amendment attorney, John Wirenius.

The tone was civil and polite throughout the two days in court as
images of
SM and
explicit sexual photographs were examined by the three judge panel.
Supporters
filled the courtroom to listen to expert testimony ranging from
Arthur
Danto, the
Emeritus Johnsonian Professor of Philosophy at Columbia University,
to the
concerns
of Dov Hechtman, a webmaster for the SM membership group The
Eulenspiegel
Society.

Barbara Nitke, fine art photographer whose work is an exploration
of sexual
relationships, testified that she feared prosecution in areas of
the country
where
there is little understanding of alternative sexual _expression.
Noted
columnists,
photographer David Steinberg and sex educator Tristan Taormino,
both
provided
sexually frank images to the court which they have not included on
their
websites
because of the vagueness of obscenity laws.

The reliability of geolocation software was challenged by testimony
from Ben
Laurie
of The Apache Software Foundation. Seth Finkelstein, a computer
technical
expert,
testified about the conflicts between geolocation software and the
protection of
privacy. Geolocation software allows website hosts to block
visitors from
certain
states or areas of states. This is a critical component of the case
because
obscenity is determined by "local community standards." Testimony
was
sharply
divided over the accuracy of geolocation software, varying over a
range of
60-95%
effective.

The difficulty of determining local community standards was
attested by
Jeffrey
Douglas, Chair of the Board of the Free Speech Coalition, who has
compiled a
study
of obscenity prosecutions called "Know Censorship." Susan Wright,
Spokesperson for
NCSF, testified as to the significant variance in local community
standards
faced
by individuals, groups, events and businesses in the SM-leather-
fetish,
swing and
polyamory communities.

The government supplied only two witnesses. Thomas Miltonberger
with Quova
testified that the geolocation software currently available would
cost a
website
owner several thousand dollars a month. Chris McCulluh with
Sinetimore
Internet
Security Service Provider suggested that Barbara Nitke request the
full name
and
address of every user who wants to access her website, and then
confirm
their
geolocation by mailing them a confirmation letter, a process that
would take
several weeks.

Written final arguments are due December 17th. This case is
expected to
reach the
Supreme Court on appeal.

Attorney General John Ashcroft is currently prosecuting people and
businesses for
violating obscenity laws. The first target under obscenity law
amended by
the CDA
was Extreme Associates which produces SM-themed pornography.
Ashcroft
continues to
meet with religious political extremist groups and has promised to
outlaw
all "obscene" material. Under the Clinton administration, obscenity
laws
were not
enforced, but the Bush administration has made obscenity
prosecutions a
priority.

NCSF is challenging the CDA law because personal websites and chat
groups
that
include discussions and images of SM, swinging or polyamory are at
risk of
prosecution. Since alternative sexual _expression is outside the
mainstream,
it is
an easy target. Membership groups that have educational and social
websites
are
also at risk, in the same way SM events were targeted by religious
political
extremist groups in the Midwest in 2002-03.

If you would like to donate to the CDA lawsuit expenses, go to:
_http://www.ncsfreedom.org/donations.htm_
(http://www.ncsfreedom.org/donations.htm) Every dollar goes
directly to ensuring
free speech on the Internet!

###

A project of NCSF

The National Coalition for Sexual Freedom is a national
organization
committed to
creating a political, legal, and social environment in the United
States
that
advances equal rights of consenting adults who practice forms of
alternative
sexual
_expression. NCSF is primarily focused on the rights of consenting
adults in
the SM-
leather-fetish, swing, and polyamory communities, who often face
discrimination
because of their sexual _expression.

National Coalition for Sexual Freedom
822 Guilford Avenue, Box 127
Baltimore, MD 21202-3707
410-539-4824
_media@n..._ (mailto:media@n...)
_www.ncsfreedom.org_ (http://www.ncsfreedom.org/)

Posted As A Service by:
The Leather SINS Social Club
A NCSF Coalition Partner
_http://www.leathersins.com_ (http://www.leathersins.com/)

Link to this postBack to top of page
daywalkerPosted: 2004-11-01 06:31
Picture of
Forum Maniac

United States
15,537 Posts

The irony is that if there were any truth to that - then you wouldn't be able to say that stuff here

Thank you Paul. I do find it funny how often Mods are accused of editing opinions they dislike,...every time one is posted, and stays up, it sort of shows the complaint to be bullshit, no?.

--
Gene
SFA Guardian Of Souls and
Angry Gothic Donald Duck
FATTERFUCK than you

Blessed is the man who has a sprinkling of enemies, for they shall make him a hero - Cursed is he who doeth good unto others who sneer upon him in return, for he shall be despised -Anton LaVey. A quote for a few of the forumites, so that they can be aware of how empowering their petty bullshit is whenever I read it. Keep feeding me your energy, I thrive on negativity, stupid.

Link to this postBack to top of page
Alpha_GeekPosted: 2004-11-02 15:16
Picture of
Forum Slut

United States
1,058 Posts
Think the NCSF will consider filing against Visa/Mastercard or the card processor that bondage.com is surrently using?

A_G
--
Alpha_Geek

I am a Grand Master Geek. I rtfm'ed many service manuals from an ancient but unnamed computer manufacturer in Fort Worth, TX.

Link to this postBack to top of page
BinderPosted: 2004-11-03 14:11
Picture of
Forum Maniac

United States
10,579 Posts

Alpha_Geek:
Think the NCSF will consider filing against Visa/Mastercard or the card processor that bondage.com is surrently using?


I don't know. I've not been able to find even a single cite to support the contention that the CC companies are threatening action over the new 7 dirty words.

Link to this postBack to top of page
GlampersPosted: 2004-11-25 09:01
Picture of
Arse Maniac!

38,164 Posts
http://www.payswiss.com/news.php

Kinda like Paypal.


Multiple Funding Options: You can fund your account with several convenient ways:
1. Credit Card
2. Money Orders
3.Personal Checks
4.Post
5.Western Union

Any use?


--

http://www.kingsofchaos.com/recruit.php?uniqid=5dvej3d2
I KILL j00!:ISO 6807-1984
"Grabbin' yo butt?! That's not very ladylike!" Büb$
SCOTTISH VIKING SQUIPMUNK MAFIA © ™
~*~HANDICAPPER GENERAL~*~
Link to this postBack to top of page
Dom-Mark666Posted: 2004-11-27 16:25
Picture of
Forum Apprentice

United States
428 Posts
lots of posts, lots of concern here -

CAN YOU SITE ADMINS TELL US WHY YOU ARE REQUESTING THIS?

Is it paranoia?
Have you received notification from the Dept of Justice?
A cease & desist order from a state Attorny General?

PLEASE TELL US!!! Freedom of speech is WORTH FIGHTING FOR!!!

Ask those who died for democracy... oh, I forgot, the Republicans won the last election...

Link to this postBack to top of page
stevepopsPosted: 2004-12-06 22:55
Forum Apprentice

United States
347 Posts

This would be totally regardless of the context in which the word(s) are used; for instance "I love Kubrick's film Lolita" or "Pedophile sentenced to jail" would have to go. Heck, if someone posts about measuring how far they walked using a "pedo meter", that would have to go. Not to mention anything about fantasy rape, etc.


I would start to put the code in the head that prevents google from travling AND caching this site.
I just did a search on "Pedophile sentenced to jail" and up comes this very post and thread on the very first google result page.

To me it's even worse that any user can click on the url and be taken DIRECTLY into the thread not having to go thru any gatekeeper page that will warn about the nature of content that might be found here.

And even if you delete the post or thread Google will REMEMBER it. You just click on the cache url under the search then you'll see a cached version.


--
Seeing is believing, but feeling is the truth

Link to this postBack to top of page
inserto_nombreaquíPosted: 2004-12-07 19:15
Picture of
Forum Apprentice

Peru
379 Posts

Foxer:
genearlly turn the country over to any fool that came across the border in a fit of multi-culturalism

¡Aiiiieeee! Tell no one.
--
In the stillness of la noche, los gatos fuck in our yards and cry, "Mao! Mao!" Such es la revolución.

Link to this postBack to top of page
bear59801Posted: 2004-12-11 16:11
Picture of
Forum Apprentice

United States
394 Posts

stevepops:

This would be totally regardless of the context in which the word(s) are used; for instance "I love Kubrick's film Lolita" or "Pedophile sentenced to jail" would have to go. Heck, if someone posts about measuring how far they walked using a "pedo meter", that would have to go. Not to mention anything about fantasy rape, etc.


I would start to put the code in the head that prevents google from travling AND caching this site.
I just did a search on "Pedophile sentenced to jail" and up comes this very post and thread on the very first google result page.

To me it's even worse that any user can click on the url and be taken DIRECTLY into the thread not having to go thru any gatekeeper page that will warn about the nature of content that might be found here.

And even if you delete the post or thread Google will REMEMBER it. You just click on the cache url under the search then you'll see a cached version.


I agree. It should not be possible to access any part of the forums or member's profiles as a guest, without first signing up for a user name and password.

Google eventually forgets, if the page goes away. But the Wayback Machine doesn't. Any publically accessible pages capable of being accessed by referral are stored there, basically forever.
--
GrizzlyBear


"Come to the edge," he said.
They said, "We are afraid." "Come to the edge," he said. They came. He pushed them. And they flew. ~Guillaume Apollinaire "Deserve's got nothin' to do with it." ~Clint Eastwood, "The Unforgiven" "There's two kinds of people in this world. Those with loaded guns, and those who dig. You dig." ~Clint Eastwood, "The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly"

Link to this postBack to top of page
ScootahPosted: 2004-12-12 05:18
Picture of
Funniest fucker on this site

Australia
2,980 Posts

I agree. It should not be possible to access any part of the forums or member's profiles as a guest

Authentication requirements/registerware exists largely as a prevention of bandwidth theft measure and visible and pretty illusion of security. projects like bugmenot.com (among others) and several webspiders and archival projects in opperation today are known to make use of accout lists, spoofed header data and proxy and route manipulation to obtain access to content intended to be protected.

While the presence of an authentication requirement with registerware scenarios (IE free sites that you register before using) - in cases where a site may mistakenly be browsed by a child, or not excluded by basic parental controls - with somewhere like bondage.com they really serve no useful purpose, and quite likely scare users away by implying the presence of data mining.

Rules suck, but the measures taken are the measures legitimate businesses opperating adult websites must take to survive in the current environment. No workaround, no wiggle room. If your a business and you own a porn site - you jump through the hoops. Count yourself lucky Visa haven't turned on ISP's to force them to participate in these sort of restrictions of speach as well.
--

Over cliff edges and along high wires, pushing for that little bit faster, that little bit harder, and that next monster trick. I think I'll confront Vader first
SFA Wombat in charge Of Scathing Sarcasm
Link to this postBack to top of page
 122 Posts on 9 pagesSpacer1Spacer2Spacer3Spacer4Spacer5Spacer6Spacer7Spacer8Spacer9Spacer

Login To Reply Login to Reply   New Topic New Topic   Printer Friendly Printer Friendly   Snitz Forums 2000

about  |  privacy  |  Webmasters, Earn Money!  |  terms  |  help!  |  acceptable use  |  bdsm links

Upgrade to Premium! Read hundreds of great BDSM stories.